Lived experience. Is there any other kind of experience? The word "lived" is redundant. We know little to nothing about the experiences of dead people. Perhaps maybe they don't have any. The use of Lived Experience suggests a fuzzy, flabby and muddled thought process. It is a red flag when someone uses it in a sentence on the radio. Experience shows that what follows will be weak. Just turn the radio off. The same goes when some ignoramus who doesn't know how to use the word "literally" comes on. It's a pretty reliable red flag indicating that what follows will be worthless.

I don't think any sane person expects everyone in an Elizabethan era television drama to speak Shakespearean English. But is it too much to expect the folk in some detective drama set in England before 1975 not to talk about being "across" something? I don't remember when that phrase sadly entered the British lexicon but it wasn't that long ago. Certainly not before the 1990s. Nor did British people use that horrible trite American euphemism for dying, "passing". Not a part of everyday speech in 1950s or 60s Gloucestershire. I can see why the casting director wants to make Gloucestershire after the Second World War look far more multi-ethnic and multi-cultural than it was in a bid to pander to the "We want to see people who look like us on television" crowd. But it's a lie. And lies should be avoided. Though I would hate it if such programmes turned into a nostalgia-based fodder for racists. The kitschy television adaption of the Hamish McBeth stories erased the village Asian shopkeeper of the original books and replaced him with a white guy. That probably wasn't racism but more an example of the mess made of the adaptation.

No-one, or no-one I would rate, would deny that the Taliban are very wrong to deny females a proper education or jobs in the professions. But a few thoughts. There's no war going on within Afghanistan to overthrow the Taliban. The education issue affects only a tiny proportion of women there. The fact that they come from the most privileged sections of society means that the Western Media, themselves bastions of privilege, identify with them and give their plight a lot of coverage. The vast majority of Afghan girls were, and are, never going to become doctors, airline pilots or lawyers and they are being hurt by Western sanctions. And I'm pretty sure the war against the Soviet Union and their Afghan Communist clients was in a large part inspired by their insistence on educational opportunity regardless of sex. The Red Army was fighting as much for girls' education as the US and NATO troops who propped up the corrupt Afghan government until recently. But we in the West supported the Mujahedin back then. What changed when it comes to the West's attitude to female education?

I've got a pile of really good books about newspaper journalism. The thing is I can't bring myself to read them anymore. The make me too sad. Journalism is pretty much dead. Most radio and television reporting was based on what was in the papers. Now the newspapers have tiny overworked staff and that shows in their poor content. And the folk who call themselves journalists these days are more interest in expressing opinions than ferreting out and presenting facts. The line between fact and opinion isn't blurred, it's non-existent. Without newspapers to ransack, radio and television are now pretty poor conduits for the information people need to take part in democratic government. News belongs to no-one but it's expensive to gather. No-one wants to pay for news and the interweb meant for a while they didn't have to. But then the flow of proper journalism died with the demise of print media as the online outlets hoovered up their ad revenue. It's a bit like why electrical appliances no longer have lives measured in decades. A washing machine or food mixer that lasts 30 years would be really expensive due to the high quality of the components. And manufacturers don't say tell you that for the price you want to pay you'll be lucky to get six years out of an appliance. So, we take a chance. Can we afford to take the same chance on shoddy news?

Imagine an airport where all three departing flights arrive at the same time, regardless of schedule for the morning, and passengers line up on the runway at the foot of a mobile stairway next to each plane. And unlike buses, there's no indication on the aircraft of their destinations. It's easy to join the wrong queue and I did. I'm referring to Kabul Airport in the mid-2000s. Maybe this was not a typical experience of flying out of Kabul with Ariana, the Afghan state airline. But I think maybe it was. The flight out of Kuwait was interesting too. All the passengers were herded into a waiting room miles from the main terminal, miles from the main airport even. Then just before the middle of the night departure time a door was opened and the passengers raced across the runway and up some steps at the back of plane. First up, first choice of seat. And from the coverings on those seats they had been salvaged from several different planes. I can't speak to the safety of the plane but I seem to remember that Ariana had been barred from European routes at the time. But I have no complaints, they got me to Kabul and back.